So sorry to hear that Pinalta. I had hoped that you would have had some closure on it.

No doubt they have their side of it and their process and timescales which may not match yours, however, I can sense the complete upset and frustration. It must be driving you mad .... or driving you on.

I wish you a speedy response and resolution. Although I am unsure what a satisfactory resolution might be for you after your tumultuous journey. Your emotional investment has also been HUGE.

Thank you firewalker for your support .
It has been a journey which has exposed him lying to me and ripping of 83 individuals over 2 years with information gathered under the freedom of information act , surely constant overcharging is fraud ?.
He accused me of a gratuitous alienation over many years but never went to court to get a act of reduction when challenged to do so and proof of my solvency offered to him .

I would have thought accusing someone of a criminal act and putting it in writing constitutes libel , can any of the experts comment on that please? .

In my opinion when he refused to implement my offer of composition drafted by Mark and accepted by ALL my creditors he did so in the full knowledge that the statement of affairs did not add up when the creditors expected to be paid , the offer was made using the information supplied by him in regard to what was in the pot , this did not match .
Then he said you could not do this under the terms of the trust deed , and it was then found out he done the same thing for another client using the same guidelines issued by the AIB .
He then argued about the AIB fee reduction saying they could not do so and had the right of appeal against the reduction , whilst at the same time instructing his solicitors to harass me with eviction letters , then started on my ex wife with the same thing , all the time extending the trust deed to draw yet more fees and use money from the deed to pay his legal bills .

Its personal now , I hope we never see each other face to face and man to man as I will be karma payback on earth .[}:)]

Hi pinalta,

I don't think any of us are trained or regulated to provide an opinion regarding a legal issue like libel.

I've written this many times before, but I hope you soon receive a determination in respect of the contested issues between you and your former trustee.

Given that you've asserted your position regarding him so robustly here, I think it's right to explain to other (potentially new) readers that your trustee has put forward their presumably very different account to the relevant insolvency regulator also.

TDA, I again bow my head to you .
All that I have stated is backed up by facts , and if my Trustee offers another explanation , it should of course be backed by facts , not threats .