Glieth we know that to be the case but we still have to wait to see if monds appeal to Supreme Court gets granted or refused but I know a lot of people who's ex trustee is having nothing to do with ppi money once they have been discharges
I'm thinking of calling my Trustee's bluff by telling them to take me to court or give me my money.. at the moment the case is on hold but I'm getting fed up now
Then it's the regulator. It has never been established that my ppi award should go to a discharged trustee. Surely natural law would suggest that I should have received the money and they should sue me for it?
What if you as you suggest HighFive you receive the money, they sue you for it, win their case along with being awarded expenses and you end up being liable for the PPI funds and the legal costs of the court case which could be considerable.
I completely sympathise with everyone caught up in this and stuck in limbo. I would feel exactly the same.
I think we just need to be patient and wait to see how it all plays out legally in court.
David is not currently posting in the Trust-Deed.co.uk forum
Interesting regards 'natural law'.
Former creditors would see 'natural law' being that they receive these funds which really should have gone to them during a trust deed if so many banks hadn't behaved so badly when they should have been properly settling these PPI disputes.
Actual law will of course, hopefully soon, decide for sure who is due the money.
"Actual law" of course, as it stands today, says that PPI claims should go to the debtor.
I am at court again on Wednesday so looks like it will be put back yet again.
It's not half true at all TDA. As it stands today, as per the most recent court ruling, trust deeds cannot be re-opened and PPI claims should go to the debtor. I'm sure you know that.
As it stands of now it is scots law that ppi after trust deed goes to debtor until another decision is made which may reverse that decision
Hi TDA
I can't predict what will happpen in court any more than you can.
I do know what the latest court ruling said .